And consider the second: After you park in the lot at work, or leave your keys in the ignition, or your car in drive, your headlights on, a door ajar there’s a warning. Forget you have your child back there and haven’t unbuckled him? Again, silence.
The answer: sensors to protect children. It isn’t rocket science, even though NASA is among those working on such a solution. The challenge is to make them mandatory.
“We’ve been working on this forever,” sighs Fannell. “It just drives me crazy.”
“Forever” in Fannell’s mind is a euphusim for “way too long.” That’s her forever because she fights until she wins.
Consider the Cameron Gulbransen Kids Transportation Safety Act signed by President Bush on February 8 of this year.
It was named for a young boy whose doctor father went out one evening, climbed into the family car to run an errand, backed over what he thought was a tossed newspaper, and was horrified, as he reached the end of the driveway to see a tiny shape wrapped in a blanket. His son had scooted from the house to ride with daddy.
The safety act will make it mandatory that automobiles come equipped with designs and equipment that give drivers far better vision of what lurks behind them. These could include the shapes of vehicles, pillar size, backup sensors, better mirrors and cameras.
Consider that recent models of the Honda Accord, Dodge Grand Caravan, Toyota Sequoia and Chevrolet Avalanche did not, in their worst cases, reveal in testing of rear view mirrors child size cones placed, respectively, at 17, 24, 25 and 51 feet. There are whole driveways that aren’t 24 feet long.
The bill also mandates pull-up switches to raise power windows, replacing some versions that could be pressed down by a child’s elbow or finger and choke a child with their head sticking out an open window and a shift/brake system that will not let a car be shifted into gear if the brake is not depressed – something a small child could not do.
You can find much of this gear already on certain cars, some with auto-reverse power windows. Sometimes it is an option, so please, buy that before you opt for the six-CD changer or the power sunroof.
The act also requires the federal government to start doing what Kids and Cars has had to do anecdotally and from news reports: set up a database of non-traffic incidents. Fannell’s group, for instance found that in 2007 and through Aug. 3 of this year, nearly 1,200 children had been hurt in or by cars in non-traffic accidents and that 347 of them had died.
These numbers, Fannell insists, are likely far below reality. Revealing that reality will make the fight more compelling. And it is a fight she vows to continue.
“Unless someone is fighting for the kids, nothing gets done,” she says, forever dawning again tomorrow.